Background
Cross-border product research often suffers from:
- Inconsistent scoring across researchers
- No clear exclusion rules for risky or non-compliant items
- Sources mixed without structure
- Outputs that are hard to compare over time
This use case builds a scan → score → filter pipeline with fixed dimensions.
Key steps
- Define dimensions: market size, compliance, logistics cost, competition, margin potential.
- Scan sources: product listings, reviews, regulatory feeds, competitor sites.
- Apply scoring rules: standardized rubric per dimension.
- Exclude risks: compliance, IP, supply-chain flags.
- Output: ranked list plus reasons, with human review queue.
Workflow sketch
Input query → Fetch sources (Tavily) → Extract facts → Score by dimensions → Apply exclusion rules → Ranked output + risk flags
Skill recommendations
openclaw skills install @clawhub/tavily
openclaw skills install @clawhub/summarize
Expected results
- Products ranked by fixed dimensions
- Risk items filtered and flagged
- Structured output suitable for spreadsheets or reports
- Clear audit trail for each score
Common pitfalls
- Changing dimensions mid-project, making comparisons invalid
- Skipping exclusion rules for compliance-sensitive categories
- Over-relying on model output without source citations
Related pages
-
Official docs → docs.openclaw.ai
-
Issues → GitHub Issues