Background
Support teams struggle with:
- Volume spikes and mixed priority
- FAQ answers repeated manually
- Slow escalation for refunds and complaints
- No consistent lookup for policies and scripts
This use case builds classify → lookup → suggest → escalate.
Key steps
- Classify tickets: FAQ, policy lookup, refund, complaint, other.
- Match to knowledge base: product docs, FAQ, internal playbooks.
- Suggest reply for FAQ and policy cases.
- Escalate refund, complaint, legal to human queue.
- Log classification and escalation for audit.
Workflow sketch
Incoming ticket → Classify → Match KB → If FAQ: suggest reply; else escalate → Log
Skill recommendations
openclaw skills install @clawhub/summarize
Add RAG or document-indexing skills if you have an internal KB. Use Feishu or similar for handoff and logs.
Expected results
- FAQ tickets with ready reply suggestions
- Refund/complaint tickets routed to human queue
- Classification and escalation logged
- Clear rules for what AI can and cannot answer
Common pitfalls
- Auto-sending refund or compensation commitments
- Missing high-risk tickets because classification rules are too loose
- No audit trail for escalations
Related pages
-
Official docs → docs.openclaw.ai
-
Issues → GitHub Issues